Have a critical understanding of the different types of good practice in relation to cross-cultural performance assessments and appraisals.

Peter Woods, in his 2003 paper on the use of performance appraisal with Australian expatriate managers in Singapore and Singaporean expatriate managers in Australia, suggests that in this particular case, the process is characterised by satisfaction with the fairness and accuracy of performance criteria. Using the paper as a starting point, write a report that gives an account, supported by relevant literature, of the purpose, main features and challenges of conducting cross-cultural performance appraisals. (Woods, P., Performance management of Australian and Singaporean expatriates, International Journal of Manpower Vol. 24 No. 5, 2003, pp. 517-534) You will be expected to demonstrate that you: 1. Read the Woods paper and other relevant literature on international performance management and appraisals. 2. Have a critical understanding of the role of performance management and performance appraisals in relation to expatriate workers. 3. Have a critical understanding of the different types of good practice in relation to cross-cultural performance assessments and appraisals. 4. Appreciate the role and implications of country and firm level differences in employment regulations and worker rights and protections, and differences in cultural values, in the development of performance assessment and appraisal practices. Learning Outcome Assessed The learning outcomes being assessed are: 1. The implications for and impact on HRM practice of differing international economic/business factors, regulations, and social & political influences 2. The concept of national culture and its implications for international HRM practice. 3. Specific human resource management processes and practices in European and other international countries, including international recruitment and selection, expatriation practice international reward and compensation, comparative performance management, comparative learning and development and leadership practice. Word Length The paper should be around 2,750 words (+/- 10%) in length plus references and any appendices. Any penalties for not complying with word limits will be in accordance with University and Faculty policy. This assignment must be submitted as an electronic copy via the module web on or before the above deadline (See instructions on module web). Please note: All work submitted after the submission deadline without an approved valid reason (see below) will be given a mark of zero. (This is not the same as a non-submission, as a late submission counts as an attempt and a mark of zero may allow you to resit the coursework.). Short deferrals (extensions) of up to three calendar weeks can only be given for genuine “force majeure” and medical reasons, not for bad planning of your time. Please note that theft, loss, or failure to keep a back-up file, are not valid reasons. The short deferral must be applied for on or before the submission date. You can apply for a short deferral by submitting an Examination/ Coursework Deferral Application Form. Application Forms along with the supporting evidence should go to the apu.io@coventry.ac.uk .

Hello, this question is here because we've worked on this and other similar assignments. If you don't know the answer, you can ask us for help. We guarantee an original paper free from Plagiarism.

Order a Similar Paper Order Different Paper

We got you covered for the whole semester.